Hi All,
there's been a very interesting development in the 'What should we be teaching in Museum and Gallery Studies' debate....(i.e. the relevance of all that critical theory you are introduced to in our BA and MA programmes).....well it seems that Nietzche's (& Foucault's, & Lyotard's, & Barthes' and etc etc) 'critical history' does have a role to play in the museum...as the (very timely) 'Opinion' (published in
Museum Practice (no less!), Spring 2009 has clearly demonstrated.....(I have a scanned copy of it, just email me and I'll 'post' it onto you).
Daniele Wagner, of the Musee d'Histoire de la Ville Luxembourg, writer of the short piece, suggests that '
historical subjects are often reduced to cliches in museums, contradicting the complexity of the past'. And she draws on Lyotard to suggest that museums should
'seek ways to stimulate critical debate about the past'.
This is really refreshing, don't you think?...At last, museum practice is seeing the relevance of a critical philosophy of history, and for you as potential museum professionals, doing all that hard thinking will not be wasted!
Of course, it is a difficult task to make such a project happen in the museum as we know, given the customary constraints. But given the significance of a 'critical history' in our understanding of the past, especially in times such as ours where there seems to be, to quote Nietzche, an '
excess of history', and given that the museum is the 'public face' of history, it seems to me that the museum is precisely the location for such criticality....
Mark